I. Material Composition Comparison
| Property | PVC | TPU |
|---|---|---|
| Harmful Substances | Contains plasticizers (e.g., phthalates), heavy metals | No plasticizers; primary component is polyurethane |
| Environmental Risks | Plasticizers may migrate into air or contact materials, posing health risks | No toxic substance release; complies with environmental standards |
| Conclusion: TPU is more environmentally friendly in terms of material composition due to the absence of plasticizers. |
II. Production Process Comparison
| Property | PVC | TPU |
|---|---|---|
| Energy Consumption | High-temperature polymerization, high energy consumption | Low-temperature polymerization, lower energy consumption |
| Waste | May produce chlorine-containing waste | Waste can be recycled and reused |
| Carbon Emissions | Higher carbon emissions per unit product | Lower carbon emissions |
| Conclusion: TPU production is more energy-efficient, low-carbon, and environmentally friendly in waste management. |
III. Recycling Comparison
| Property | PVC | TPU |
|---|---|---|
| Recycling Rate | Difficult and costly to recycle | 100% recyclable and reprocessable |
| Reprocessing Performance | Significant performance degradation after recycling | Stable performance post-recycling |
| Circular Economy | Challenges in forming a closed-loop recycling system | Ideal for circular economy models |
| Conclusion: TPU is fully recyclable and aligns with circular economy principles. |
IV. Environmental Advantages in Applications
V. Regulatory and Certification Support
VI. Conclusions and Recommendations
Summary: TPU outperforms PVC comprehensively in material composition, production, recycling, and regulatory compliance, making it the more environmentally sustainable choice.